DISTANCE LEARNING AS THE ALTERNATIVE TO TRADIONAL EDUCATION IN TIMES OF COVID-19 PANDEMIC
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24919/2413-2039.12/44.7Keywords:
distance learning, crisis distance education, traditional education, student-centered approach.Abstract
Summary. The article deals with the analysis of the world education situation caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. Distance learning has commonly been accepted as the sole and exclusive education solution at the time of emergent events resulting in closing of educational establishments in the world in 2020. The distance learning ideas, introduction and organizational issues have found their partial coverage in certain scientific works, but the problem of crisis replacement of traditional education by distance learning remains insufficiently studied. The distinct difference between the terms “distance learning” and “crisis distance education” is represented. It lies in sudden, unready and forceful implementation. To the differences we refer: suddenness, internationalism, popularity, expansion, imposition, etc. The advantages, disadvantages and problems of the distance learning in higher education during the pandemic are studied. Crisis can produce an environment where current changes in the system of education are more accessible than in regular times. The transition of the traditional education into the crisis distance education must be developmental. Presently the scientific researchers state that the role of the educator must be reinterpreted. So, we come to the problem which remains a sharply debated question leading to a conflict between two prevailing teaching orientations: the teacher-centered approach against the student-centered approach. Today, the teacher-centered approach is criticized for the reason of traditional standardized testing, failure to measure acquired knowledge and stimulate learning. Most online educators have found that a helpful way to think about teaching in a student-centered fashion will transform the distance learning into a producrive, effective and progressive process. Using distance learning technology, teachers should: inspire students, express creativity, provide individual support, encourage to learn, motivate students and engage them in the knowledge acquisition process. The three forms of interaction for students in the online environment (student-content, student-student, student-instructor) are analyzed. The situation of distance learning introduction in Ukraine is represented. Despite the fact that Ukrainian population is not characterized by a high level of digital literacy, there appear a number of other problems such as decreasing success rate of students, poor Internet quality and the lack or absence of devices for online learning. The study emphasizes that successful functioning of distance learning in crisis period should be based on a student‐centered approach to learning. The role of the teacher must be focused mainly on students and identifying of potential barriers of learning.
References
1. Allen, I.E., & Seaman, J. Digital compass learning: Distance education enrollment report 2017. Boston: Babson survey research group. URL: https://educationaltechnologyjournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s41239-020-00194-2 (last access 14.02.2021).
2. Biggs, J. Teaching for Quality Learning at University. St. Edmundsbury Press, Suffolk, 1999. 357 p.
3. Communications Department of the Secretariat of the CMU. Oleksiy Honcharuk: National Digital Literacy Platform “Diia: Digital Education”. URL: https://www.kmu.gov.ua/en/news/oleksij-goncharuk-nacionalna-osvitnyaplatforma-z-cifrovoyi-gramotnosti-diya-cifrova-osvita-startuye-vzhe-21-sichnya (last access 10.03.2021).
4. Darling-Hammond, L. Performance based-assessment and educational equity. Harvard Educational Review, 1994. No. 64, (1). Pp. 5–30.
5. Education and the Pandemic: the attitudes of Ukrainians towards distance learning and External Independent Testing in 2020. URL: https://dif.org.ua/en/article/education-and-the-pandemic-the-attitudes-of-ukrainianstowards-distance-learning-and-external-independent-testing (last access 15.03.2021).
6. Feasley, C.E. Distance education. Encyclopedia of educational research /in M. C. Alkin ed. New York: Macmillan, 1992. Pp. 334-342.
7. Foley, J.K. Distance education for American universities and the world. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1998. No. 80, (5). Pp. 973–979.
8. Golden, C. Remote teaching: The glass half-full. EDUCAUSE Review. URL: https://er.educause.edu/blogs/2020/3/remote-teaching-the-glass-half-full (last access 01.04.2021).
9. Ham, R. Distance education: Teaching tools for the 21 century. The Technology Teacher, 1995. No. 54, (6). Pp. 43–45.
10. Lily, A.L., Ismail, A.F., Abunasser, F.M. Distance education as a response to pandemics: Coronavirus and Arab culture. 2020. URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7387275/ (last access 10.04.2021).
11. Moore, M.G. Editorial: Three types of interaction. American Journal of Distance Education, 1989. No. 3, (2). Pp. 1–7. URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/08923648909526659. (last access 03.03.2021).
12. Riggs, S. Student-centered remote teaching: Lessons learned from online education. Educause, 2020. URL: https://er.educause.edu/blogs/2020/4/student-centered-remote-learning. (last access 03.03.2021).
13. Roblyer, M.D., Edwards, J., Havriluk, M.A. Integrating educational technology into teaching. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill, 1997.
14. Sinclair, M. Education in emergencies. Learning for a future: Refugee education in developing countries. UNHCR, Geneva, Switzerland, 2001. Pp. 1–84.
15. The Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine. Presentation of the First Digital Literacy Survey in Ukraine (2019). URL: http //www.youtube.com/watch?v=t3ghLyjzqLM&feature=youtu.be (last access 03.03.2021).
16. The State Statistics Service of Ukraine. Communication Subscribers as of January 1, 2019. URL: http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/operativ/operativ2019 /zv/az/az_e/az0119_e.htm (last access 04.03.2021).
17. UNESCO (2020a). COVID-19 education. URL: https://en.unesco.org/covid19/educationresponse/globalcoalition (last access 03.02.2021).
18. UNESCO (2020g). Adverse consequences of school. URL: https://en.unesco.org/covid19/educationresponse/consequences (last access 02.02.2021).
19. What is E-learning. URL: https://www.igi-global.com/dictionary/administrators-assessments-online-courses-student/8785). (last access 10.02.2021).
20. WHO. Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) Pandemic. World Health Organization: web-site. URL: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019. (last access 07.02.2021).