THE USE OF PEDAGOGICAL SYSTEM OF MARIA MONTESSORI IN UKRAINIAN EDUCATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24919/2413-2039.9/41.175703Keywords:
pedagogical system of M. Montessori; a child of preschool age; educational process; self-development; pedagogical observation; child-centrism.Abstract
The article reveals the features of the formation and development of the pedagogical system of M. Montessori, which is relevant in the context of the modern tendency of education in introducing the ideas of child-centrism. The basic philosophical foundations of this pedagogical system are analyzed and its advantages in the process of raising a child in conditions of independent development are determined. The system of preschool education is highlighted as the initial one in the process of educational practice. The requirements for the formation of a special educational space in the process of child development are defined; the features of the methodological foundations in preparing teachers for work with children of preschool and primary school age are highlighted. The conditions of the activity of the school «Smiley», which works on the M. Montessori’s system in the city of Ivano- Frankivsk, are described. The conditions for improving the activities of children and teachers in order to individualize the educational process, promote the development of children in a nature-friendly environment, and develop their own strategies for cooperation between parents of pupils and teachers are highlighted. The pedagogical level of the M. Montessori’s system contributes to the implementation of the theory of child-centrism and meets the conditions of child development in a democratic society, since it treats the problem of interaction between an adult and a child in the process of educational activity as a free expedient activity of children in specially organized didactic conditions. The methodological level of the M. Montessori’s system reveals specific techniques and means of raising and educating children, an experimentally tested methodology for working with a complex of original didactic Montessori materials. Pedagogy of M. Montessori puts the interests of the child at the forefront in the organization of education, providing conditions for individual development. This approach ensures the implementation of the basic humanistic traditions of Ukrainian ethnic pedagogy, where the child is the subject of social development. And the Ukrainian model of the Montessori-school, created over the past decades, confirms the relevance of this system for solving the modern needs of society in raising a free, independent, proactive, civic responsible, intellectually literate person. The article emphasizes the advantages of using the pedagogical technology of M. Montessori in working with children of preschool and primary school age in one educational space, where the child’s development system is implemented sequentially on the basis of continuity.
References
Ackerman, D. (2019). The Montessori preschool landscape in the United States: history, programmatic inputs, availability, and effects. ETS research report series. doi: 10.1002/ets2.12252.
Bruce, C. (2014). Montessori Method. In C. Reynolds, K. Vannest, & E. Fletcher-Janzen (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Special Education. doi: 10.1002/9781118660584.ese1583.
Chepil, M. (2017). Pedahohika Marii Montessori u pidhotovtsi fakhivtsiv doshkilnoi osvity v universytetakh Ukrainy [Maria Montessori’s Pedagogy in Pre-School Education at Universities of Ukraine]. In J. Kot (Ed.), Osobowość, społeczeństwo, polityka ‒ Personality, society, politics (pp. 203–205). Lublin: WSEI [in Ukrainian].
Dewey, J. (2000). Demokratie und Erziehung. Weinheim und Basel: Beltz, Hemsberg [in German].
Dychkivska, I., & Ponimanska, T. (2006). M. Montessori: teoriia i tekhnolohiia [M. Montessori: theory and technology]. Kyiv: Vydavnychyi Dim «Slovo» [in Ukrainian].
Khiltunen, E. (2008). Deti Montessori: kniga dlia pedagogov i roditelei [Montessori Children: the book for teachers and parents]. Moskva: Astrel: AST [in Russian].
Kremen, V. (2009). Pro «Dytynotsentryzm», abo Chomu osvita Ukrainy potrebuie strukturnykh zmin [About «Child-centrism» or why Ukrainian education needs structural change]. Den – The Day, 210 (3130) [in Ukrainian].
Lillard, A., & Taggart, J. (2019). Pretend Play and Fantasy: What if Montessori Was Right? Child Development Perspectives, 13, 85–90. doi: 10.1111/cdep.12314.
Pate, R., O’Neill, J., Byun, W., McIver, K., Dowda, M., & Brown, W. (2014). Physical activity in preschool children: comparison between Montessori and traditional preschools. Journal of School Health, 84, 716–721. doi: 10.1111/josh.12207.
Piaget, J. (1977). The moral judgment of the child. London: Penguin Books.
Rusova, S. (1918). Doshkilne vykhovannia [Preschool education]. Katerynoslav [in Ukrainian].
Sukhomlynskyi, V. (1976). Problemy vykhovannia vsebichnorozvynenoi liudyny [Problems of education of a comprehensively developed person]. (Vol. 1). Kyiv: «Radianska shkola» [in Ukrainian].
Ushynskyi, K. (1983). Ridne slovo, knyzhka dlia tykh, khto navchaie [Mother tongue, a book for those who teach]. (Vol. 2), (pp. 232–299). Kyiv: «Radianska shkola» [in Ukrainian].
Vyhotskyi, L. (1991). Pedagogicheskaia psikhologiia [Pedagogical psychology]. Moskva: Pedagogika [in Russian].
Yakymenko, S., & Milenina, H. (2015). Pedahohichni idei Sofii Rusovoi ta Marii Montessori: porivnialnyi analiz [Pedagagogical ideas of Sofia Rusova and Maria Montessori: comparative analysis]. Kyiv: Slovo [in Ukrainian].
Zhebrovskyi, B. (Ed.). (2007). Visnyk Montessori: yuvileinyi vypusk [Journal of Montessori: anniversary edition]. Kyiv: NAPN [in Ukrainian].