EDUCATIONAL INFLUENCE OF ADULTS ON THE FORMATION OF LANGUAGE-SPEECH AND LINGUISTIC READINESS OF PRE-SCHOOLERS TO STUDY AT SCHOOL: THEORETICAL ASPECT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24919/2413-2039.8/40.164378Keywords:
children of pre-school age; speech and linguistic readiness for study at school; speech development; speech abilities; linguistic development; communicativenessAbstract
The article analyzes the content of training of children in pre-school educational institutions regarding the problem of forming speech and linguistic readiness for study. It is determined that special readiness for study at school means readiness for the acquisition of the educational program in certain disciplines, which envisages a set of specific knowledge, abilities and skills or the prerequisites for their mastery. The specifics and conditions of formation of speech and linguistic readiness of pre-schoolers for study at school have been cleared out. It is determined that linguistic development is connected not only with the preparation for the study of reading and writing, but it takes place in inextricable unity with the development of speech throughout the pre-school period, and not only in the elderly age; it promotes the educational interest in the phenomena of language, develops speech and linguistic abilities of the child. Based on the subjective-activity approach, it is assumed that the core of the model of speech and linguistic development is the dynamic structure of empathy of the child’s relationship and the closest socio-cultural environment, which together make up various children and adults communities (in the first place, children-parents and children-pedagogues) who aspire to achieve the level of the collective subject. The interconnected complex of these subjects carries out system-forming, mediated and compensatory functions in relation to various bio-social and cultural influences on children’s speech. This approach to the problem can overcome the principle of immediacy in the study of various socio-cultural factors of speech and linguistic development of the child. The analysis of studies on the development of speech of pre-school children, in particular, diary entries, has helped to identify a conditional standard for the assimilation of a child of the preschool age of the native language. The conclusions about contemporary notions about pre-school children’s ontogenesis have been formulated. It is proved that the sensory information complex consists of auditory, visual and tactile images, which, in addition, amplifying each other, increase the number of useful signals, expand the speech space, which, in turn, helps to limit the choices when choosing the adequate speech sample during the perception, recognition and awareness of spoken language. For the assimilation by children the elements of the language system influence the following factors, namely: dependence on the simplicity or complexity of the language phenomenon and the degree of its communicative significance. It is determined that «speech and linguistic readiness for study at school» is an integral entity represented by a set of personal-purposeful, substantive and procedural components that enable the pre-school child to effectively perform the function of the subject of educational activity at school. It is concluded that the formation of speech and linguistic readiness of preschool children for study at school is considered through the prism of its interconnections with the components of the external and internal structures of the educational process in the institution of pre-school education. It is reasonable to introduce a wider use of the term «linguistic development of pre-schoolers» in the integrated educational programs.
References
Bohush, A., & Havrysh, N. (2013). Doshkilna linhvodydaktyka: teoriia i metodyka navchannia ditei ridnoi movy [Pre-school language pedagogy: theory and methods of teaching children native language]. Kyiv: Slovo [in Ukrainian].
Gvozdev, A. (2005). Ot pervykh slov do pervogo klassa: dnevnik nauchnykh nabliudenii. [From the first words to the first class: diary of scientific observations]. Moscow: KomKniga [in Russian].
Zdanevych, L. (2013). Proiavy movlennievoi pasyvnosti ditei 5-ho roku zhyttia yak pokaznyk komunikatyvnoi dezadaptatsii [Manifestations of language passiveness of children of the 5th year of age as the index of communicative deadaptation]. Pedahohichnyi protses: teoriia i praktyka – Pedagogical Process: theory and practice, 2, 185–189 [in Ukrainian].
Zimniaia, I. (2001). Lingvopsikhologiia rechevoi deiatelnosti [Linguistic psychology of speech activity]. Moscow, Voronezh: Izd-vo NPO MODEK [in Russian].
Kalmykova, L. (2017). Perspektyvnist i nastupnist v navchanni movy y rozvytku movlennia ditei doshkilnoho i molodshoho shkilnoho viku: psykholinhvistychnyi i linhvometodychnyi vymiry [Perspective and continuity in teaching language and speech development of children of pre-school and primary school age]. Kyiv: Slovo [in Ukrainian].
Krutii, K. (2014a). Rozvytok pochuttia movy u ditei zasobamy shtuchnykh tekstiv (na materiali linhvistychnoi kazky L.S. Petrushevskoi) [Development of the language feeling of children by means of artificial texts (by the example of linguistic tale by L.S. Petrushevska)]. Psykholinhvistyka – Psycholinguistics, 15, 215–226 [in Ukrainian].
Krutii, K., & Bohush, A. (2014). Doshkilna lingvodydaktyka: slovnyk-dovidnyk [Pre-school linguodidactics: dictionary-manual]. Zaporizhzhia: TOV «LIPS» LTD [in Ukrainian].
Krutii, K. (2014b). Rozvytok linhvokreatyvnykh zdibnostei doshkilnyka: ohliad suchasnykh pidkhodiv [Development of linguistic creative abilities of a pre-schooler: review of modern approaches]. Uchenye zapiski Krymskogo inzhenerno-pedagogicheskogo universiteta. Pedagogicheskie nauki – Scientific notes of the crimean engineering and pedagogical university. Pedagogical sciences, 48, 12–17 [in Ukrainian].
Krutii, E. (2015). Surzhik ili bilingvalnyi fenomen v detskoi rechi [Mixed dialect or bilingual phenomen in children’s speech]. Curriculare und soziale Aspekte der Bildung und Erziehung bilingualer Kinder. Das Neue in Erforschung und Vermittlung des Russischen – Curriculum and social aspects of the education and upbringing of bilingual children. The new in research and mediation of Russian, 6, 50–57 [in Russian].
Leontev, A. (1969). Iazyk, rech, rechevaia deiatelnost [Language, speech, speech activity]. Moscow: Nauka [in Russian].
Lepskaia, N. (1994). Osnovnye napravleniia v izuchenii ontogeneza rechi [Basic rules in the study of speech ontogeny]. Problemy izucheniia rechi doshkolnika – The problems of studying the speech of a preschooler. Moskva: Izd-vo RAO [in Russian].
Rumiantceva, I. (2018). O shirokom poniatii ontogeneza rechi i ego znachenii dlia prikladnikh nauk [About broad understanding of speech ontogeny and its importance for applied science]. Izvestiia Rossiiskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta imeni A.I. Gertcena – News of the Russian State Pedagogical University named after A.I. Herzen, 189, 22–28 [in Russian].
Sakharnyi, L. (1989). Vvedenie v psikholingvistiku [Introduction to psycholinguistics]. Leningrad: Izd-vo Leningr. un-ta [in Russian].
Sokhin, F. (2002). Psikhologo-pedagogicheskie osnovy razvitiia rechi doshkolnikov [Psychological-pedagogical bases of pre-schoolers’ speech development]. Moscow, Voronezh: MODEK [in Russian].
Ushakova, T. (2004). Dvoistvennost prirody recheiazykovoi sposobnosti [Duality of the nature of speech ability]. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal – Psychological Journal, 25 (2), 5–16 [in Russian].
Ushinskii, K. (1988). O pervonachalnom prepodavanii russkogo iazyka [About the primary teaching of Russian language]. Pedagogicheskie sochinenie – Pedagogical Works (Vols. 1‒6; Vol. 5). Moscow: Pedagogika [in Russian].
Khomskii, N. (1972). Iazyk i myshlenie [Language and thinking]. Moscow [in Russian].
Tceitlin, S. (2000). Iazyk i rebenok: lingvistika detskoi rechi [Language and child: linguistics of children’s speech]. Moscow: VLADOS [in Russian].
Tceitlin, S. (2018). Ontolingvistika v puti [Developmental linguistics on the way]. Izvestiia Rossiiskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta imeni A.I. Gertcena – News of the Russian State Pedagogical University named after A.I. Herzen, 189, 12–22 [in Russian].
Chepil, M. (2017). Dytyna yak subiekt vykhovannia u pedahohichnii spadshchyni Sofii Rusovoi. Nauka i osvita – Science & Education, 2 (155), 20–24. doi: 10.24195/2414-4665-2017-2-4 [in Ukrainian].
Chukovskii, K. (1990). Ot dvukh do piati [From two till five]. (Vol. 1, pp. 73–404). Moskva: Pravda [in Russian].
Shakhnarovich, A., & Iureva, N. (1990). Psikholingvisticheskii analiz semantiki i grammatiki (na materiale ontogeneza) [Psycholinguistic analysis of semantics and grammar (based on ontogeny)]. Moscow: Nauka [in Russian].
Bloom, L. (1970). Language development: Form and function in emerging grammars (pp. 33–49). Cambridge, Mass: М.I.T. Press.
Conti-Ramsden, G., & Durkin, K. (2012). Language development and assessment in the preschool period. Neuropsychology Review, 22 (4), 384–401. doi: 10.1007/s11065-012-9208-z.
Krentz, U.C., & Corina, D.P. (2008). Preference for language in early infancy: the human language bias is not speech specific. Developmental Science, 11, 1–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00652.x.
Kuhl, P.K., & Meltzoff, A.N. (1997). Evolution, nativism and learning the development of language and speech. In M. Gopnik (Ed.), The inheritance and innateness of grammars (pp. 7–44). New York: Oxford University Press.
Majorano, M., & D’Odorico, L. (2011). The transition into ambient language: a longitudinal study of babbling and first word production of Italian children. First Language, 31, 47–66. doi: 10.1177/0142723709359239.
McMurray, B., & Aslin, R.N. (2005). Infants are sensitive to within category variation in speech perception. Cognition, 95 (2), B15‒B26. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.07.005.
Saaristo-Helin, K., Kunnari, S., & Savinainen-Makkonen, T. (2011). Phonological development in children learning Finnish: a review. First Language, 31, 342–363. doi: 10.1177/0142723710396793.
