BLUE STRAWBERRY OR GIANT MOUSE? THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE SCRUB EFFECT FOR ASSESSING INTERFERENTIAL CONTROL IN THE PROCESS OF TEACHING CHILDREN TO READ
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24919/2313-2094.4/36.98642Keywords:
контроль перешкод, ігнорування контролю, ефект Струпа, когнітивний розвиток, дошкільний вік.Abstract
BLUE STRAWBERRY OR GIANT MOUSE? THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE SCRUB EFFECT FOR ASSESSING INTERFERENTIAL CONTROL IN THE PROCESS OF TEACHING CHILDREN TO READ
References
1. Archivald S.J., Kerns K.A. Identification and Description of New Tests of Executive Functioning in Children, Child Neuropsychology,1999, 5, pp. 115 – 129.
2. Alvarez J.A., Emory E. Executive function and the frontal lobes: A meta-analytic review, Neuropsychology Review, 2006, 16, pp. 17 – 42.
3. Bower B. Brother Stroop’s enduring effect, Science News, 1992, 141, 19, pp. 312 – 315.
4. Catale C., Meulemans T. The Real Animal Size Test (RAST): A new measure of inhibitory control for young children, European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 2009, 25, 2, pp. 83 – 91.
5. Carlson S.M. Developmentally sensitive measures of executive function in preschool children, Developmental Neuropsychology, 2005, 28, 2, pp. 595 – 616.
6. Durgin F.H. The reverse Stroop Effect, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2000, 7, 1, pp. 121 – 125.
7. Friedman N.P., Miyake A. The Relations Among Inhibition and Interference Control Functions: A Latent-Variable Analysis, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2004, 133, 1, pp. 101 – 135.
8. Heij W.L., Boelens H., Kuipers J.R. Object interference in children’s colour and position naming: Lexical interference or task-set competition?, Language and Cognitive Processes, 2010, 25, 4, pp. 568 – 588.
9. Ikeda Y., Okuzumi H., Kokobun M. Age-related trends of stroop-like inter-ference in animal size tests in 5-to 12-year-old children and young adults, Child Neuropsychology, 2013, 19, 3, pp. 276 – 291.
10. Kagan J., Lemkin J. Form, color, and size in children’s conceptual behavior, Child Development, 1961, 32, 1, pp. 25 – 28.
11. Killikelly C., Szücs D. The development of interference control: A pliot study using the manual colour word stroop paradigm, Procedia. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2010, 2, pp. 4842 – 4847.
12. Kochanska G., Tjebkes T.L., Forman D.R. Children’s emerging regulation of conduct: Restraint, compliance, and internalization from infancy to the second year, Child Development, 1998, 69, pp. 1378 – 1389.
13. Okuzumi H., Ikeda Y., Otsuka N., Saito R., Oi Y., Hirata S., Haishi K., Kokobun M. Stroop-Like Interference in the Fruit Stroop Test in Typical Development, Psychology, 2015, 6, pp. 643 – 649.
14. Lezak M.D. Neuropsychological Assessment (Third Edition). – New York : Oxford University Press, 1995, pp. 1 – 1000
15. Liu Q., Zhu X., Ziegler A., Shi J. The effects of inhibitory control training for preschoolers on reasoning ability and neural activity, Scientific Reports, 2015, 5, pp. 1 – 10.
16. Macleod C.M. Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an inte-grative review, Psychological Bulletin, 1991, 109, pp. 163 – 203.
17. Prevor M.B., Diamond A. Color-Object Interference in Young Children. A Stroop Effect in Children 31/2 – 61/2 Years Old, Cognitive Development, 2005, 20, pp. 256 – 278.
18. Santostefano S. Cognitive controls and exceptional states in children, Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1964, 20, 2, pp. 213 – 218.
19. Stroop R. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1935, 18, pp. 643 – 662.
20. Siegel A.W., Vance B.J. Visual and haptic dimensional preference: A developmental study, Developmental Psychology, 1970, 3, 2, pp. 264 – 266.
21. Wright B.C., Wanley A. Adult’s versus children’s performance on the Stroop task: interference and facilitation, British Journal of Psychology, 2003, 94, 4, pp. 475 – 485.
